| When to choose | You need surface condition, texture, defects, facade, roof or heritage capture. | You need maximum geometry accuracy and a complete object point cloud. | You need overview photos/video without a measurable model or orthophoto. | You need a working design model based on capture or scanning data. |
|---|
| Visual detail | Strong: texture, color, damage, masonry, decor and surface condition. | Limited without photo capture; strong for shape, not always for texture. | Photos are available, but without connected 3D geometry and scale. | Depends on modeling scope; actual texture is usually not the main goal. |
|---|
| Geometry and accuracy | Depends on capture, control points and surface quality; good for orthophotos and visual models. | Best for high accuracy, complex interiors and coordinate basis. | Low measurability without photogrammetric processing. | Geometry is created from source data and the agreed LOD/LOG. |
|---|
| Deliverables | TIFF/PDF orthophotos, OBJ/FBX/GLB/PLY mesh, LAS/LAZ/E57 when needed, PDF schemes. | E57/RCP/LAS point cloud, DWG, BIM and orthophotos in a combined capture. | Photos, video, overview materials and sometimes a simple map by request. | RVT, PLN, IFC, DWG/PDF, 3D model and schedules by agreed scope. |
|---|
| Limitations | Weak on flat, mirror, transparent and poorly lit surfaces. | Does not replace textures and visual capture without photo or aerial capture. | Does not solve measurable facade elevations and mesh models by itself. | Not a capture method; quality depends on the source data. |
|---|